this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2026
53 points (81.2% liked)

politics

30314 readers
2562 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A woman who dated Maine U.S. Senate candidate Graham Platner says he forced her to have sex with him nearly five years ago despite her repeated objections, an allegation Platner denies.

The woman, a 41-year-old Maine resident named Jenny Racicot, detailed the alleged incident to POLITICO in three interviews over the past two weeks. POLITICO also spoke with a man Racicot dated and confided in the years after the alleged incident, and reviewed documents, including emails between Racicot and her therapist and messages between Racicot and an acquaintance whom she warned against getting involved with Platner years before he ran for office.

Racicot said she had an on-and-off relationship with Platner, who is now the Democratic Senate nominee in Maine, for more than two years before he entered her rural Maine home uninvited one night in late 2021, deeply intoxicated, and forced himself on her while she repeatedly told him to stop. She said she cut off contact with him after telling him the encounter was not consensual.

“I remember him grabbing my pelvis and being really forceful of me,” she said. “I remember the specific moment where I thought to myself, like, ‘This is no longer my choice.’”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Asafum@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I love living in America where our choices always seem to be this fucking guy or this fucking guy plus corruption and corporate boot licking.... It's so fucking wonderful that out of 400 million fucking people, these are the people we end up with...

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The "good" news is that this is not a uniquely American problem. You just aren't paying attention to other countries' elections.

That said? The key, like in almost all things, is to work with your local party. Folk deeply underestimate the value of having someone in the room (when the cameras are off) saying "Can we maybe not explicitly endorse genocide?" or "People want their tax dollars to go to something that matters". The DSA have finally started to realize that and it is doing wonders. Find the locals who actually would be good candidates and push them in the primaries. And... it gets more than a bit sketchy, but there are also efforts to "import" candidates to some districts with the goal of running them after they "put down roots" for a year or three.

The problem is that people don't want to do that. MAYBE they'll send a text but they expect The Party to provide exactly what they want with no prodding. And, to be fair, for a lot of the most basic of things... the Democrats really shouldn't need to be told. But that leads to people like platner. Borderline sociopaths who just want power who will come out of nowhere, flash some cash, say words they know will get the influencers to talk about them, and win.

Like... it isn't THAT WKUK skit, but https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FtJuiTAR29E kinda sums things up.