politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
Platner just isn’t going to win after this unless it’s roundly debunked. Would I still vote for him over Collins in November if I lived in Maine? Probably, but I wouldn’t be pumped about it at all anymore.
Best case scenario is he drops out and the Maine DSC nominates a new candidate who isn’t Mills.
Not possible.
And, honestly, if I were him, I'd cut a deal to just recoup costs and go home.
Nominating a new person is a loss. Platner got to where he is because he's an outsider and charismatic. Which is what wins elections. Subbing in someone who the party establishment chooses will be neither of those things.
We're stuck relying on that charisma and anti-establishment sentiment to blow through this. And if many other elections are anything to go by, it's got a good chance of doing so.
Yeah. That trick has never worked. Most recently, it didn't work for VP Harris.
You are asking Democratic voters to overlook a credible rape allegation, we are not Republicans. It’s not going to happen, Platner is not going to win after this.
I don’t know how the Maine DSC works, but it’s not a given they’ll shit out Mills depending how they work. In my state, delegates from each caucus would vote for it, and our delegates this year were HEAVILY left-leaning (a midwestern state).
Seems to be a lot of folk arguing we should still support Platner in here.
Denial (cope?) stage. Give it a day or two, I hope
Bill Clinton still gets a speaking slot at Democratic conventions.
That’s not a good comparison at all. People don’t vote for speakers at conventions, and Bill is very unpopular and would get decimated in any election right now even if he was 20 years younger
Source on Bill Clinton's unpopularity? Because him speaking is only ever a minor controversy with progressives and that's more because of his shitty third way policies that have caused a lot of harm.
He's the 12th most popular Democrat in this YouGov poll, sandwiched between Mark Kelly and Pete Buttigieg.
Apparently so is forcibly raping people.
That's how the accusation hits the front page, but the Not Guilty verdict is on page 16 in a year. If he comes out not-guilty, I wanna see lawsuits.
Should Platner take his own advice then?