this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)
Entrepreneur
0 readers
1 users here now
Rules
- No Personal Attacks - criticism of ideas is allowed, attacking people is not.
- Self Posts Only - links can only provide supplementary material. Your post must contain enough content to have a discussion.
- No “How To Get Rich Quick” posts - This community is not about making a quick buck. Posts asking the community how to make $X, without making specific reference to a reasonable idea, are not tolerated.
- Avoid unprofessional communication - Please treat fellow entrepreneurs like respected coworkers, label conversations if NSFW and avoid deliberate provocations.
Please feel free to provide evidence-based best practices, share a micro-victory, discuss strategy and concepts with a frame work, ask for feedback, and create professional conversation. Treat every post as if you're at work and representing the best version of yourself.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Am an employer with a remote team.
its a mixed bag.
Started with the pandemic, then people moved away.
pros:
- no office expense.
- flexibility
- no commute
- saves a pile of time getting things done
- can hire people from anywhere
cons:
- creativity is harder
- people who slack are harder to recognize
- mental health toll of being solo
- getting together is hard
- requires certain kinds of personality to work Well.
i do like our remote setup, but am aware it limits us in some ways.
Why would u say that is harder to recognize slacking people? I would say just by hearing the dailies and having one-on-ones every now and then you could get it.
And usually there is some sort of measurable thing, as programmer just looking at my Jira ticket plus commit history is kinda easy to understand if I’m doing smth or not and if I’m not then I should be saying in the daily what’s the issue I’m getting so someone can help/be aware.
People play in the margins. Working remotely, there's less environmental feedback for self awareness.
Focused work that could have taken the day without distractions takes weeks. Small talk in remote conference calls explodes. People make very different decisions about what to act on when they can be pulled into a "burning" need with very little context from a chat thread or invisible threat.
As an employer it's quite baffling to watch. Suddenly it's as if leadership have "no idea what we do" and only people in the trenches "truly know". But when you get fed up after weeks, and bring them into an in-person workshop it gets done that day. All without anyone acknowledging that maybe they weren't on focus or on scope, but instead continuing to claim there is so much that needs attending to.
In an office setting, there's an immediate feedback loop. If you're over indulging in small talk or playing in too many conversations, there's social proof. Few people want to be known as a busy body or a slacker. But remotely those same people become the self-appointed town hero by being an octopus on roller skates - A lot going on but no-ones getting anywhere soon.
With all the good people flustering, finding those who are genuinely exploiting the situation beyond that is even harder again. You have your suspicions by day 10, but there's so much room to play in the margins that it takes 6-9 months to pin it down.
As a fully remote employee I feel all of this. Have you ever listened to the founder of Automattic’s podcast, “Distributed”? It has some good thoughts
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/distributed-with-matt-mullenweg/id1463243282?i=1000614616984