Data Hoarder

1 readers

1 users here now

We are digital librarians. Among us are represented the various reasons to keep data -- legal requirements, competitive requirements, uncertainty of permanence of cloud services, distaste for transmitting your data externally (e.g. government or corporate espionage), cultural and familial archivists, internet collapse preppers, and people who do it themselves so they're sure it's done right. Everyone has their reasons for curating the data they have decided to keep (either forever or For A Damn Long Time (tm) ). Along the way we have sought out like-minded individuals to exchange strategies, war stories, and cautionary tales of failures.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

communick@selfhosted.forum

QLC for long-term storage ? (alien.top)

submitted 11 months ago by MiniSpip@alien.top to c/datahoarder@selfhosted.forum

8 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Looking for more silence and more importantly: Less vibrations and humming noises, I'm thinking about replacing my 5 HDDs (10 to 16TB) with SSDs.

Considering Samsung QVO 8TB for their capacity at an acceptable $ / TB price.

But...

I'm a bit wary of QLC.

What's your experience with long-term QLC usage ?

I'm not looking for performance (have 2 NVMEs for that), but reliable, long duration hoarding of medias. Though, there will be quite a bit of writing / overwriting.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] WikiBox@alien.top 2 points 11 months ago

I don't think anyone has long term experience with qlc storage. It isn't old enough for that.

Manufacturers have most likely simulated accelerated aging using heat, and set their warranty accordingly.

Don't expect more than what the warranty promise.

There is no consumer long term digital storage solution. Except multiple copies and continuous migration to new media.