this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Emacs

312 readers
1 users here now

A community for the timeless and infinitely powerful editor. Want to see what Emacs is capable of?!

Get Emacs

Rules

  1. Posts should be emacs related
  2. Be kind please
  3. Yes, we already know: Google results for "emacs" and "vi" link to each other. We good.

Emacs Resources

Emacs Tutorials

Useful Emacs configuration files and distributions

Quick pain-saver tip

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
rglullis
raphael
1
Is the lack of multithreading support in emacs a dealbreaker for you? (alien.top)
submitted 11 months ago by saarin@alien.top to c/emacs
45 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

View Poll

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AIDS-RAT@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (4 children)

It might not be a dealbreaker for me per say, but it's absolutely something that should be included one day.

[–] peterhoeg@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Out of curiosity - what are your use-cases where the lack of multi-threading is an issue?

[–] Icommentedtoday@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Tramp

[–] nv-elisp@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

No detail in your response. How would Tramp benefit from multithreading in any way that isn't achievable already with an asynchronous approach?

[–] terminal_prognosis@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

Are you sure the problem there is threading? I'm pretty sure it is not. There's very little CPU usage. The problem is TRAMP is written synchronously when it should be asynchronous, not that it doesn't have threads.