this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2026
1136 points (98.4% liked)

Work Reform

17064 readers
1293 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] snooggums@piefed.world 18 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Social security benefits shouldn't be proportional to income, it should be a set amount that everyone is eligible and it should be collected proportional to income including capital gains and everything else.

[–] chisel@piefed.social 3 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

That's a UBI, not Social Security. It's a great idea! But it's not Social Security.

[–] sportsjorts@lemmy.zip 11 points 3 weeks ago

If that were UBI then I would get paid before I was 67.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Social security paying retirement and disability payments is different from UBI. I am simply saying paying in should be proportional to income but the benefits should not.

A CEO and minimum wage worker should get the same social security benefits and they would be higher than they currently are if we taxed the Epstein class properly.