this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2026
274 points (98.6% liked)

Privacy

10303 readers
624 users here now

A community for Lemmy users interested in privacy

Rules:

  1. Be civil
  2. No spam posting
  3. Keep posts on-topic
  4. No trolling

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Talentlesssculptor@lemmy.world 0 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Should we limit the rights of trans people to visit women's restrooms and changing rooms because some perverts use that loop hole to abuse women as well?

I want you to be consistent in your application of the law.

[–] BucketBong@p.hobo.social 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Put that goalpost back where it was, we're talking about meta glasses and the inappropriate use, but, to answer crazy with crazy, if, for some miraculous reason, trans people gained the ability to record with their eyes and upload it to the internet, we'd have to probably do something about it, but, as far as I know, they can't secretly record videos with their eyes, unless they can and they're all keeping it a secret from us... can you lot record videos with your eyes? that would be pretty fucking cool if you could.

[–] Talentlesssculptor@lemmy.world -1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Put that goalpost back where it was, we’re talking about meta glasses and the inappropriate use

And I brought up the right of men to enter women's spaces and the inappropriate use of that right. It is not my fault that you can't follow a very simple train of thought.

but, to answer crazy with crazy

Again, your inability to understand might make reason seem crazy, but go off king.

if, for some miraculous reason, trans people gained the ability to record with their eyes and upload it to the internet, we’d have to probably do something about it,

What about if trans people physically and sexually abuse women in women's spaces? What then?

[–] BucketBong@p.hobo.social 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Your train of thought went in a direction far away from the topic, just seems like you want to go on an anti trans rant, so I'm gonna bounce.

[–] Talentlesssculptor@lemmy.world -2 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Run away when the truth would paint you as the hypocrite you are.

[–] BucketBong@p.hobo.social 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Talentlesssculptor@lemmy.world -1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

If you think we should ban smart glasses because gross white men can use them to record women in public, we should ban gross men from accessing women's spaces. Do you agree or are you a hypocrite?

[–] BucketBong@p.hobo.social 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Banning technology/banning a living person... Yeah totally the same argument. You need help man.

[–] Talentlesssculptor@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Banning use of a space vs banning the use of certain technology in a space. I get that you can't speak openly on the trans issue because you fear social backlash, but please actually answer the question instead of dodging.

What about body cams? Should we ban the public from owning these as well?

[–] BucketBong@p.hobo.social 0 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I don't share your views on trans people so I'm not bothering with it.

To your question about bodycams for the public, if the camera is obvious what it is, in plain sight and has a visual notification to say when it's recording, then that's fine.

If it's hidden inside an object that has no distinction that it's a camera and looks nothing like a camera or shows no signs its recording, then no, that's an issue.

The real issue this post is about, is people bringing meta glasses that are indistinguishable from other Ray bans into places where people have the right to privacy, it's about the violation of privacy with technology.

[–] Talentlesssculptor@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I don’t share your views on trans people so I’m not bothering with it.

What do you mean "views on trans people"? I am pro trans, but against the idea that a biologically male individual has access to spaces reserved for biological females. Aren't you?

To your question about bodycams for the public, if the camera is obvious what it is, in plain sight and has a visual notification to say when it’s recording, then that’s fine.

So the pigs can adjust their behavior accordingly? How does boot leather actually taste?

The real issue this post is about, is people bringing meta glasses that are indistinguishable from other Ray bans into places where people have the right to privacy, it’s about the violation of privacy with technology.

Which places are these? What places of privacy exist where men and women can co-mingle? I don't know of many co-ed dressing rooms, shower facilities etc. in America, but sure, ban smart glasses from these.

Most of the cases of people recording women I have seen have been in public. You agree that this shouldn't be illegal in one party consent states right?

[–] BucketBong@p.hobo.social 0 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

You're an insane person, I'm done, you win, I'm gonna go have a bong and play some videogames.

[–] Talentlesssculptor@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Can you tell me why I am insane or are you just going to retreat into your safety blanket of drugs because reality got too real?

[–] BucketBong@p.hobo.social 0 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Nah I'm all good, imma let you live with the belief you won an internet argument with a random stranger.

You can work out why you're insane yourself, not my job to do that. Peace out dumb cunt.

[–] Talentlesssculptor@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)
[–] BucketBong@p.hobo.social 0 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Nah I'm just gonna ignore you from now on, like most people in your life probably do, so no real change for you.

[–] Talentlesssculptor@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

Holy fuck you just can't stop engaging with "insane" people can you? All that yapping and still no answer to a simple question.

[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Says the pervent that wants the ability to wear pervert glasses in women's restrooms

[–] Talentlesssculptor@lemmy.world -2 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Go fuck yourself with your ad hominem. Cunt.

[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 1 points 12 hours ago

I'm so sorry, I misspoke. I'll correct it:

Says the ~~pervert~~ pedophile that wants the ability to wear ~~pervert~~ pedophile glasses ~~in women's restrooms~~ around children

[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 2 points 15 hours ago

You must be mad that I'm right. Shame hurts, doesn't it?