this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2026
278 points (98.6% liked)

Privacy

10303 readers
694 users here now

A community for Lemmy users interested in privacy

Rules:

  1. Be civil
  2. No spam posting
  3. Keep posts on-topic
  4. No trolling

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
iopq@lemmy.world
278
The Backlash Is So Strong That People With “Pervert Glasses” Are Afraid to Use Them in Public (tech.yahoo.com)
submitted 1 day ago by TIEPilot@lemmy.world to c/privacy@lemmy.world
98 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] unitedwithme@lemmy.today 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, Meta, but also the feed is non-stop and it has people on the other end watching all the time. Huge lack of privacy, assuming you go to the bathroom wearing them, or intimate with your SO. Meta pushed hard for facial ID tech so you could "see" who's around you, etc.

I just hate Zuck the cuck trying to infiltrate every aspect of people lives for "engagement" while blaming OSes for allowing his platforms to be used for the addictive nature, NOT taking ownership or fixing it at all. No apologies, no responsibility, nothing. Takes his billions to build a compound in Hawaii for when shit hits the fan he can't be attacked..

[–] Talentlesssculptor@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Sure, meta and Zuck the cuck are horrible, but the idea of hidden cameras has got utility.

[–] unitedwithme@lemmy.today 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

How so? And worth the utility over every other horrible aspect?

[–] Talentlesssculptor@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Well hidden cameras are a great tool for the under privileged to record systematic oppression by law enforcement and other agents in society.