Programming

27716 readers

548 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Follow the programming.dev instance rules
Keep content related to programming in some way
If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

snowe@programming.dev

Ategon@programming.dev

UlrikHD@programming.dev

bugsmith@programming.dev

Spyro@programming.dev

181

Zig creator calls Bun’s Claude Rust rewrite ‘unreviewed slop’ (www.theregister.com)

submitted 23 hours ago by HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org to c/programming@programming.dev

59 comments fedilink hide all child comments

*The Rustification of Bun#

Rewriting 500,000 lines of Zig into another language would be a gargantuan undertaking if done by hand. “A rewrite in another language would take a small team of engineers a full year. It would mean freezing bugfixes, security fixes or feature development for that time,” Sumner wrote.

Instead, Sumner went with Claude. He spun up about 50 dynamic Claude Code workflows, reaching a peak of about 1,300 lines of code per minute and generating over a million lines of Rust code. The job took 11 days and cost about $165,000 at API pricing. Claude Fable did most of the heavy lifting.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

you can't compare the tech debt because it's essentially a line by line translation from an existing codebase, not 1M brand new lines of code

[–] ReptilianCleric@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 hour ago

That's...irrelevant.

Really. The specific details of the task doesn't change that this was automated. Until it's reviewed, it's basically a pile of Schrödinger's bugs and security holes. That's the technical debt.