this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2026
582 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

86387 readers
4186 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] eicker@lemmy.world 64 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

We are repeating an old pattern in computing: throw more hardware at the problem until efficiency becomes impossible to ignore. Bigger models have delivered remarkable gains, but they’re increasingly expensive. The next breakthroughs may come less from adding parameters and more from smarter architectures, better algorithms and more efficient inference.

[–] Rothe@piefed.social 13 points 10 hours ago

Except there likely won't be a lot of further breakthroughs if we burn down our planet faster than we already do.

This is all an expenditure of vast amounts of energy for literally no gain for anybody except a handful of billionaires and their corporations.

[–] Vlyn@lemmy.zip 39 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

DeepSeek has really led the way here, especially as they are a bit more hardware constrained. Plus they openly publish their findings and release open source models, so high hopes there.

It's probably China's play to pop the AI bubble, but I'm all for it (:

[–] ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

I wonder what all is in the deepseek code that is malicious. I'd like to try it but don't want a million Mb/s of tracker shit across my network and can't run it myself.

[–] qaz@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

AFAIK, their open models are distributed as weights, not executables and are therefore not able to start network connections / run code. There if of course tool-calling functionality but that just works by having the model output a special pattern and having something external run predetermined commands based on that.

[–] Vlyn@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 hour ago

They are open source models, nothing malicious about them. I'd be much more careful about where you run your agents on. The wrong prompt can even make a non-malicious model misbehave.