this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2026
173 points (98.3% liked)

Linux

66538 readers
830 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] whimsy@lemmy.zip 15 points 4 days ago (1 children)

For all his great work on Linux (and git and others) Torvalds was never into activism so much. He declined GPLv3 (yes it would be impossible to get all contributors to sign for it). He's always been an "open source pragmatist", which is fine I guess. And I really respect his work. But at these important political points, we need someone like Stallman who has consistently proven to be on the right side of the debate

[–] peskypry@lemmy.ml 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

This. Google would not be fucking us with Play Integrity and other DRM craps if Linus made the kernel GPLv3 licensed. It would have been a dreamland to have hackable phones, TVs and a whole lot of IoT devices where the users would be controlling them instead of other way around.

[–] Eggymatrix@sh.itjust.works 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Nah, they just would have either used something else, or fucked us with some other way. The kernel license just allowed them to do it like this.

[–] eldebryn@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If they're gonna make proprietary black boxes of spying, I'd rather they spend their own money for it rather than using the code created by the selfless FOSS contributors, ngl.

Just because fascism-lovers desire a dystopia doesn't mean we have to make it easy for them.

[–] Eggymatrix@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You seem to have a very idealized idea of how selfless this whole thing is. Google has sponsored a lot of work in the kernel, so have multiple corporations over the years. This is not some puppies and raibows shit here.

It just happens to work really well because the license and multiple interest of a good kernel do just that: a good kernel.

Surveillance issues and too strong corporations are an issue with your government, not the kernel

[–] eldebryn@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

I'm not absolving governments at all so I'm not quite antithetical to this position either. I understand that a GPL license might have meant less corporate incentives but I also do despise how most corporations are moving these days so it is what it is I guess.