this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2026
55 points (96.6% liked)

Selfhosted

60910 readers
1180 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

  1. Be civil.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts are to be related to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

  7. Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details. Tags [CBH] or [AIP] are required, see the links in Rule 8 for details.

  8. AI-related discussions and AI-involved promotional posts have additional requirements for tagging, as noted in Rule 7 and the AI & Promotional Post Expanded Rules post, and find example disclosures here.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
ruud@lemmy.world
Loki@lemmy.world
CannaVet@lemmy.world
devve@lemmy.world
ayyy@sh.itjust.works
curbstickle@anarchist.nexus
curbstickle_lw@lemmy.world
55
Self-hosting, data sovereignty and cyberattacks [AIT] (aussie.zone)
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by SuspiciousCarrot78@aussie.zone to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
27 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

https://lemmy.world/post/49736885

If you follow AI news at all as part of your self-hosting interests, you may have become aware recently that open AI (the frontier lab between behind chat GPT) has admitted (loosely) culpability in an cyber attack against HuggingFace (the major repository of open-weight models.)

The details that present are somewhat sketchy, but the gist of it is that open AI seems to have given unrestricted access to a AI agent, which then attacked hugging face, who in a twist of deliciousness, used an open source agent to defend themselves.

I'd joke and tell you to make sure that you haven't left any open ports on your router, but if you're here reading this I think probably you know better than that.

Less comically, there's a weird intersection here between self-hosting, sovereignty and encroachment by big tech that is worth pay attention to.

It should certainly spur people on to seriously consider self-hosting as much of their infrastructure as they can (and securing it) if this is the preview of things to come.

Something is rotten in the state of Denmark.

I just wish I'd bought more SSDs.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dgriffith@aussie.zone 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Consider only exposing a VPN service, like Wireguard.

Then when you are away from home, it's one tap / click to be back on your LAN again.

[–] non_burglar@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You don't even need to lift a finger. I use WG Tunnel, which turns on my VPN as soon as I leave my WiFi. I'm always tunneled or home.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 1 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

some kind of wireguard proxy would be nice though to not expose my home IP address wherever I go (guest wifi networks)

[–] non_burglar@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

I suppose so, but all they'll see is a an encrypted session.