this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2026
427 points (98.6% liked)

politics

30535 readers
3544 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 80 points 3 days ago (5 children)

I think the more salient question is:

Why didn’t Merrick Garland?

[–] Asafum@lemmy.world 41 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Because he's the biggest fucking coward this country has ever had to suffer the existence of. I almost hate him as much as I do the Republicans

[–] Captainvaqina@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The fall of the US lands squarely on Biden and Garlands shoulders.

[–] Nouvellalia@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Other than the people actually doing it and all the people who voted for it, yes.

[–] BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

People being like "The President can't tell the DOJ...." Yes he can, he can tell them to get off their asses because he's their top boss.

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Literally we've been watching Trump do it for a year and a half. He can absolutely tell them "get shit in gear on this or you're out".

[–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 1 points 23 hours ago

Part of me hopes that the reason they didn’t is because of feared backlash. Now the script is reversed; do it or face the backlash. Trump showed you how. Get it the fuck done.

[–] GreenBeard@lemmy.ca 18 points 2 days ago

Look, the Democrats don't want to prosecute white collar criminal behaviour, some of their best friends are white collar criminals... namely the Republicans sitting across from them in congress.

[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I see a lot of blaming Biden and Garland, but not much mention of SCOTUS which was instrumental for trump getting away.

Whether he was in real trouble they inserted themselves and saved him. They even invented absolute immunity when a case was so damning and straight forward that didn't look like there was a possibility of him getting away.

I suspect the result would still be the same even if Biden and Garland did it exactly the way people accusing them due those political hacks (they don't deserve to be called judges, they are anything but).

Sadly, right now even if progressives will massively win in 2026, 2028 and following elections they still will be similarly blocked on every step unless SCOTUS is unfucked which as I understand will have to be done by expanding the court.

[–] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

This is very true

14th amendment Section 3

No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

They just made up some bullshit that said you can’t keep him off the ballot.

Even though we saw him do this on TV

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Merrick Garland appointed Jack Smith who investigated and charged Trump with crimes but then the American public decided they collectively didn't give a fuck what Trump has done and re-elected him as president.

Don't try to shift blame here it was the voters and the non-voters who gave Trump a get out of jail free card.

[–] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I agree that Trump was reelected

I do not agree that had Merrick Garland not slow walked the prosecution, that would have been the case

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world -2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It was the most complicated prosecution in US history and it would have gone somewhere if he wasn’t re-elected.

Four years is a heartbeat in cases less complicated than that one.

[–] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

OMG

  1. we saw it happen on live TV

  2. journalist recorded all the planning that they did on parlor

this was an opening shut case

an opening shut case

You’re thinking open and shut but it really wasn’t.

Trump was the president.

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago

Because Biden told him not to