this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2026
435 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

86580 readers
4247 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
435
Codeberg bans vibe coded projects (blog.codeberg.org)
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by beep@piefed.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
134 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

cross-posted from: https://piefed.world/c/tech/p/1279028/codeberg-bans-vibe-coded-projects

Relevant .

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] zaphod@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How can I prove that I have ownership over code I wrote myself, and that it isn’t copyrighted somewhere in the world?

As long as you had no access to that code and have some proof of that then that should be quite easy. I.e. you never worked for a company that claims copyright on something you wrote.

Developers also “generate” code and are also “trained” on code they written as freelancers or employees for others which is potentially copyrighted.

Then you need to do a proper clean-room rewrite with people who had provably no access to the original code.

[–] Fedditor385@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago

Well, if I use AI, it's still considered I wrote the code, just with help. And I personally never saw the code nor had access to it. Also, whatever I implemented must be clean room implementation then. If it was that simple, then we would not have the copyright issue to begin with. LLM can't be an author nor can it be legally liable.