this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2026
550 points (99.1% liked)
Technology
86751 readers
3049 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Offer to buy at 500x the highest value it ever had, when adjusted for inflation, plus 10% of the company's revenue going forward, and maybe I'd consider it.
Yeah an outrageous amount, plus ethical costs to undo all the fuckery, the lost peace, the labor and lost investments, and all of that doubled, is the correct fee.
If the house would have sold for 1m, ask for 50m, then the environmental damage costs in equipment and labor and plants and animals, so now we're up to 1b, doubled to 2b, and a fat 50% fuckyou fee on top and round up to 3b usd.
People need to aim higher. If the company won't pay and will ruin your life instead, then guess their intent is actual war, and they shall have it.
Don't let the bullies win. Fight back.
More reasonable: roll back to before the datacenter was permitted for construction, find substantially equivalent houses in the general area - 20% more square footage, 20% higher value per square foot, and track their values over time until the present, and whatever the peak was, offer 20% more than that plus moving expenses... effectively 175% of "fair" value + maybe $20K.
Why be "reasonable" with unreasonable people?
Being "reasonable" with unreasonable people is unreasonable. Be reasonable.
So far what they've done sounds like they're trying to be somewhat reasonable. They bought a bunch of acreage as a sound buffer zone and they offered to buy people's houses at a price we don't have information on. We don't really know how unreasonable they're going to be.
Most reasonable: burn down the data center and build low cost housing on the ashes.
Plus .5% of all future profits.
Always get a part of the gross, there's no net!
So... An extra $0?
Yeah, 0.5% was what I was offered as Director of 50% of new startups... 0.005% is more realistic - and could range from 0 to outrageous.