this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2026
932 points (98.0% liked)

Lefty Memes

7227 readers
224 users here now

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of "ML" (read: Dengist) influence. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Serious posts, news, discussion and agitprop/stuff that's better fit for a poster than a meme go in c/Socialism.

If you are new to socialism, you can ask questions and find resources over on c/Socialism101.

Please don't forget to help keep this community clean by reporting rule violations, updooting good contributions and downdooting those of low quality!

Rules

Version without spoilers

0. Only post socialist memes


That refers to funny image macros and means that generally videos and screenshots are not allowed. Exceptions include explicitly humorous and short videos, as well as (social media) screenshots depicting a funny situation, joke, or joke picture relating to socialist movements, theory, societal issues, or political opponents. Examples would be the classic case of humorous Tumblr or Twitter posts/threads. (and no, agitprop text does not count as a meme. Please post agitprop here)


0.5 [Provisional Rule] Try to use alt text or image descriptions to allow for greater accessibility


(Please take a look at our wiki page for the guidelines on how to actually write alternative text!)

We encourage alternative text (from now referred to as "alt text") to be added to all posts/comments containing media, such as images, animated GIFs, videos, audio files, and custom emojis.
EDIT: For files you share in the comments, a simple summary should be enough if they’re too complex.

We are committed to social equity and to reducing barriers of entry, including (digital) communication and culture. It takes each of us only a few moments to make a whole world of content (more) accessible to a bunch of folks.

When alt text is absent, a reminder will be issued. If you don't add the missing alt text within 48 hours, the post will be removed. No hard feelings.


0.5.1 Style tip about abbreviations and short forms


When writing stuff like "lol" and "iirc", it's a good idea to try and replace those with their all caps counterpart

  • ofc => OFC
  • af = AF
  • ok => OK
  • lol => LOL
  • bc => BC
  • bs => BS
  • iirc => IIRC
  • cia => CIA
  • nato => Nato (you don't spell it when talking, right?)
  • usa => USA
  • prc => PRC
  • etc.

Why? Because otherwise (AFAIK), screen readers will try to read them out as actually words instead of spelling them


1. Socialist Unity in the form of mutual respect and good faith interactions is enforced here


Try to keep an open mind, other schools of thought may offer points of view and analyses you haven't considered yet. Also: This is not a place for the Idealism vs. Materialism or rather Anarchism vs. Marxism debate(s), for that please visit c/AnarchismVsMarxism.


2. Anti-Imperialism means recognizing capitalist states like Russia and China as such


That means condemning (their) imperialism, even if it is of the "anti-USA" flavor.


3. No liberalism, (right-wing) revisionism or reactionaries.


That includes so called: Social Democracy, Democratic Socialism, Dengism, Market Socialism, Patriotic Socialism, National Bolshevism, Anarcho-Capitalism etc. . Anti-Socialist people and content have no place here, as well as the variety of "Marxist"-"Leninists" (read: Dengists) (actual ML's are welcome as long as they agree to the rules and don't just copy paste/larp about stuff from a hundred years ago).


4. No Bigotry.


The only dangerous minority is the rich.


5. Don't demonize previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


We must constructively learn from their mistakes, while acknowledging their achievements and recognizing when they have strayed away from socialist principles.


6. Don't irrationally idolize/glorify previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


Notable achievements in all spheres of society were made by various socialist/people's/democratic republics around the world. Mistakes, however, were made as well: bureaucratic castes of parasitic elites - as well as reactionary cults of personality - were established, many things were mismanaged and prejudice and bigotry sometimes replaced internationalism and progressiveness.


  1. Absolutely no posts or comments meant to relativize(/apologize for), advocate, promote or defend:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

not to mention all the progress traps capitalism stepped into

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

By voting. The US has set term lengths at every level. If the leaders are not fulfilling their job properly, they get fired.

For representatives it’s every two years.

That requires having an informed and active constituency though, which we do not have.

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And it will never happen because the people who control the resources also control the narrative. They promote their candidates, who change the laws in their favour, and progressively make things worse for your average person.

The system you describe is a pipe dream, and it's a nice dream, but it's not reflective of the world we live in today.

[–] Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's literally the only possible system that could work. The alternative is just giving unrestricted power to politicians, and the people have no say at all.

Their power is ultimately derived from the voting public. That's it. That is the power. You either have the ultimate power rest with the people, or the people have zero power.

It's a cop out excuse to not put in the effort to be active and informed in the system. "It's pointless anyway" is just defeatist bullshit.

[–] pleiades@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 hours ago

They're calling it the falsest dichotomy of all time

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I really wish I could believe in the system as much as you do. I think I'd be happier that way.

However, all the power lies with the capital. The capital controls the narrative, which in turn leads to people voting against their interest. The capital promotes their politicians. The politicians enact politics in favour of the capital. Then ultimately, capital controls the forces.

See for example how Murdoch and Thatcher completely destroyed the newspaper unions in England during the 80s. They went from having really strong worker rights and collective power, to being completely powerless and literally shot at by police within the span of a few years, all due to processes the workers were purposely locked out of.

[–] Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world 0 points 19 hours ago

It's not about believing in the system.

It's the only system we can have that the people will have any power. It's either democracy, or being ruled over. And we will always trend towards the latter if the people abdicate the power they have.

There will NEVER be a time where we can just sit back and say "cool, things are good now, we don't need to participate in politics anymore". It will ALWAYS be either fighting to enforce our own power, or fighting to get that power back through revolution.

The power may lie with capital right now, but that's because >1/3 of people (at least in the US) simply sit at home on their fat asses and don't even try to participate in the system. And that's for the biggest elections too. Where things really matter, at the state and local level, primaries where you get a say in who is even on the ballot, turnout is even worse.

Where I am, we have mail in voting, and a ballot is automatically sent to you, along with a booklet with everything on the ballot. The full text of what you're voting on, a plain English explanation of what it will do, any tax changes that would happen from it, and arguments for and against. For primaries, if you're not registered with a party you get both ballots and get to choose which one to vote in. It literally could not be any easier to vote. Our primaries this year? Thirty-fucking-six percent. 36%. And that was a "surge" in participation.

You can vote in your underwear at home, for weeks before the election date. And 64% of people still said fuck it, they don't care enough. **That's **entirely why the wealthy are able to control things. The people do not give a shit enough about it to even do their basic civic responsibility and exercise their vote, from their goddamn couches.

[–] pleiades@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And what happens when the elections are not-so-subtly influenced by corporate lobbyists and whoever has more money to spend on campaigning?

[–] Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Then the people need to put even more effort into exercising their power. It's that simple.

[–] pleiades@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And how do you propose they do that, since it's so simple?

[–] Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Well, voting for one. The US has abysmal voter turnout. More people stayed home and said they don’t give a shit in 2024 than either candidate got in votes.

The highest turnout we’ve had in over 100 years is 66%. A full 1 in 3 people that can vote put literally zero effort into voting.

That would be a decent start. Just actually doing anything to participate in the system.

[–] pleiades@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

And why don't people want to participate in voting? Could it be that they feel like their vote doesn't matter for some reason? Tell me, who should I have voted in 2024 if I'm pro-palestine?

[–] Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world 0 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

By not voting you explicitly stated you’re fine with exactly what we have now.

Voting is a zero sum game. Someone is going to win whether you stay home or not, and that someone is going to massively affect your life and the lives of others.

And Harris would have been infinitely better than Trump for Palestinians.

So congratulations, you decided that your protest no-vote was more important than Palestinian lives. Because by not voting you said you’re fine with Trump openly supporting their genocide. Their blood is on your hands just as much as Trump supporters.

I am so sick of you idiots letting perfect be the enemy of good, and sleepwalking us all into fascism because you think you’re so special and they need to earn your vote specifically. It’s childish and selfish.

[–] pleiades@lemmy.ml 0 points 8 hours ago

By not voting you explicitly stated you’re fine with exactly what we have now.

The point is to organize outside of the system to be able to force change, because time and time again working within the system has been shown to do jack shit.

And Harris would have been infinitely better than Trump for Palestinians.

Yeah no, she has repeatedly expressed support for Israel.

Everyone knows that the way to defeat fascism is by voting it out of power. That's exactly how mussolini and hitler were defeated, right? Get real. This "lesser-evil" style of voting will take us down the road to fascism no matter what.