this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2026
48 points (94.4% liked)

PC Gaming

15174 readers
476 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] leave_it_blank@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

As if they would let you download the patches from their website like 20 years ago.

And no DRM? I don't believe it. Like never!

If there is the slightest online DRM this release is worthless. Sadly the article isn't very clear on this.

But if it really has not DRM and the patches are freely available to download there is no reason to not release it on gog for example.

DRM free is my only reason to pay, but I don't want to go back to physical media.

[–] freeman@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 days ago

Of course it has fucking denuvo.

Physical media has never precluded DRM, quite the opposite it has constituted part of it.

[–] Lydon_Feen@lemmy.world -1 points 2 days ago

Speak for yourself. I'm definitely getting this.