this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2026
466 points (91.9% liked)

Technology

86875 readers
4816 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Great starting point for wasting time maybe.

Let me waste 5 minutes reading slop than another 20 min tying to figure out if its a hallucination or just not accurate. 25 minutes that could have been reading a credible accurate source...

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

In the scenario, what pointed you towards said credible accurate source? Google?

[–] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Not op, but a search engine is a better starting point than an LLM, because it is a predictable tool, fetching internet resources which can be evaluated on their merits.

The AI presents itself as the actual information.

I see too many people in my daily life saying "the ai summary said..." and it is worse than useless.

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

A page rank based search engine would still require a vetting of results.

Google is mostly AI currated results, it will push approved and sponsored souces.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca -1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Google is a search engine, not a source.

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago

what pointed you

Yes, that was implied.