this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2026
88 points (90.0% liked)

Linux

14583 readers
200 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] massive_bereavement@fedia.io 13 points 2 days ago (3 children)

What are you yapping about? The 1% refers to the low end of framerates, usually when games have lag spikes. This approach makes those spikes less noticeable because the APU power management doesn't get in the way.

[–] nekusoul@lemmy.nekusoul.de 26 points 2 days ago

If I had to guess this is about the blatantly false title of the article.

[–] Davel23@fedia.io 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think he's berating the author of the article for using a title that implies that the improvement is to overall frame rates, not 1% lows.

[–] laurelraven@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 days ago

If I understand them correctly, doesn't boosting 1% lows have a bigger impact on the smoothness of the game than the overall? Boosting the high of 60 up to 80 if the lows are around 30 is still going to feel a bit jagged, but boosting that 30 to 40 is going to do a lot more to smooth it out.

I haven't read the article, being perfectly honest, but it targeting 1% lows makes this better, not worse, like OP seems to suggest