this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2026
586 points (99.3% liked)
Technology
86875 readers
3904 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I’m not technically inclined enough to harden against that, nor do ai really have the inclination. But here is a thread on that topic where I even heard about it.
!privacy@lemmy.ml
https://lemmy.ml/post/49710604
I did just read I think 90% of that, and it just seems like that person is sour about systemd in general.
I agree it's not unix/Linux philosophy but it's the best we have.
Does it do too much? Maybe. I haven't seen that exploited on a large scale in the real world, but it's definitely a golden key.
There are options. But it's just one of those things. You're pissing in the wind unless you're willing to write it yourself. You can use non systemd distros or even use bsd.
All that said, you're absolutely right to be concerned, but speaking on it like it's an active vulnerability is dangerous.
It's also evident that it's reliant on the software you run, it's not systemd that's giving you away, it's your application that you chose to install that's abusing or neglegent of systemd's access.
I didn’t saw it was dangerous only that it was similar to MS GDID, and it is.