Machine Learning

1 readers

1 users here now

Community Rules:

Be nice. No offensive behavior, insults or attacks: we encourage a diverse community in which members feel safe and have a voice.
Make your post clear and comprehensive: posts that lack insight or effort will be removed. (ex: questions which are easily googled)
Beginner or career related questions go elsewhere. This community is focused in discussion of research and new projects that advance the state-of-the-art.
Limit self-promotion. Comments and posts should be first and foremost about topics of interest to ML observers and practitioners. Limited self-promotion is tolerated, but the sub is not here as merely a source for free advertisement. Such posts will be removed at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

communick@academy.garden

[D] Without a clear leader in AI do you think the race to AGI will start to get chaotic? (alien.top)

submitted 2 years ago by Ok_Reality2341@alien.top to c/machinelearning@academy.garden

20 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Title really - right now the leader of OpenAI is blurry, which isn’t good for the industry to follow.

We need a strong leader to focus our efforts, but if this isn’t the case - perhaps it’ll get chaotic?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] SciGuy42@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

"We need a strong leader..."

No, we don't. Nobody has a real clue about how to get to AGI and there isn't even a precise definition of AGI (my personal one is just by examples, namely R2D2, C3PO, or Commander Data but it's just my personal one, not an objective definition, and even those aren't "general" for 100% of problems but neither are humans).

There many individual leaders in AI and whether you choose one or more of them to focus on particular efforts, that's up to you. Science is supposed to be democratic, not a dictatorship.