Machine Learning

1 readers

1 users here now

Community Rules:

Be nice. No offensive behavior, insults or attacks: we encourage a diverse community in which members feel safe and have a voice.
Make your post clear and comprehensive: posts that lack insight or effort will be removed. (ex: questions which are easily googled)
Beginner or career related questions go elsewhere. This community is focused in discussion of research and new projects that advance the state-of-the-art.
Limit self-promotion. Comments and posts should be first and foremost about topics of interest to ML observers and practitioners. Limited self-promotion is tolerated, but the sub is not here as merely a source for free advertisement. Such posts will be removed at the discretion of the mods.

founded 11 months ago

MODERATORS

communick@academy.garden

[D] DallE3 paper (alien.top)

submitted 10 months ago by Username912773@alien.top to c/machinelearning@academy.garden

8 comments fedilink hide all child comments

What are your thoughts on the DallE3 “paper” which doesn’t cover technical or architectural details? The only useful takeaway seems to be “higher quality data is better” and “image captioning models that provide a great amount of detail can create good datasets.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] hopefigerova@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

yeah, it's frustrating when a paper doesn't share the technical details. Academic research should be open-source so others can build on it. This feels more like a weird impersonation than a proper research paper. If they're not going to share the technical details, they should just publish a blog post instead.