Machine Learning

1 readers

1 users here now

Community Rules:

Be nice. No offensive behavior, insults or attacks: we encourage a diverse community in which members feel safe and have a voice.
Make your post clear and comprehensive: posts that lack insight or effort will be removed. (ex: questions which are easily googled)
Beginner or career related questions go elsewhere. This community is focused in discussion of research and new projects that advance the state-of-the-art.
Limit self-promotion. Comments and posts should be first and foremost about topics of interest to ML observers and practitioners. Limited self-promotion is tolerated, but the sub is not here as merely a source for free advertisement. Such posts will be removed at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

communick@academy.garden

[D] Without a clear leader in AI do you think the race to AGI will start to get chaotic? (alien.top)

submitted 2 years ago by Ok_Reality2341@alien.top to c/machinelearning@academy.garden

20 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Title really - right now the leader of OpenAI is blurry, which isn’t good for the industry to follow.

We need a strong leader to focus our efforts, but if this isn’t the case - perhaps it’ll get chaotic?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] bitemenow999@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

OpenAI is not a leader in AI, just because you know about chatgpt doesn't make them a leader... There are tons of research labs that are clearly at the forefront of ML

Also what is AGI? there is no clear definition yet, everyone has their own idea of AGI.