this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2026
479 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

86995 readers
4568 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] foenkyfjutschah@programming.dev 3 points 1 day ago (3 children)

nah some dude got recently covered in press b/c he used an LLM to derive Assembly from C.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Huh? C compiles to machine code.

[–] enumerator4829@sh.itjust.works 0 points 21 hours ago

Yes, but why write C when we can let the LLM write assembly directly? Compilers are unnecessary bloat we don’t have a need for with modern technology.

[–] leanleft@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

low-level compilers can output very ugly-looking assembly. he probably did this and then used LLM to super-optimize it. may be perfomant, but id guess that theres a risk that its unsafe.

[–] Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Who cares about ugly-looking assembly ? No one's gonna actually look at it, that's, like, the whole point of C. And I really doubt the plagiarism machine can somehow do better than a compiler. I'm gonna look this up

Edit : is it this one ? https://arxiv.org/html/2505.11480v1