this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2026
295 points (98.0% liked)

PC Gaming

15316 readers
375 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] VitoRobles@lemmy.today 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It's playable like the way a early access game is playable.

There's streams out there. From the streamers and fans who donated over 10k, it's playable.

For anyone with half a brain... No.

[–] Ibuthyr@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago

Most early access games are more playable though. This game is just garbage.

[–] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's still more than a tech demo. Just wanted to be sure I had the right idea.

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 6 points 2 days ago

Fair enough, its more like 4 tech demos mashed together in a way that none of the 4 like. The core of this game is clearly more spaghetti code then Kerbal Space Program and is missing the vast majority of promised features after 14 years (like reloading apparently).

We know the scope creep killed this project, just that for people who have put in $1000s its hard to admit. The tech debt alone likely makes this game impossible to make stable.