Seagate SAS ST12000NM0027 over 3 months.
Gonna see how long it’ll keep going for.
this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)
Data Hoarder
1 readers
1 users here now
We are digital librarians. Among us are represented the various reasons to keep data -- legal requirements, competitive requirements, uncertainty of permanence of cloud services, distaste for transmitting your data externally (e.g. government or corporate espionage), cultural and familial archivists, internet collapse preppers, and people who do it themselves so they're sure it's done right. Everyone has their reasons for curating the data they have decided to keep (either forever or For A Damn Long Time (tm) ). Along the way we have sought out like-minded individuals to exchange strategies, war stories, and cautionary tales of failures.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Yup, never really had an issue (touch wood) with any of the other sizes and I had 4 of this exact model get a bunch of defects.
Would def avoid the ST12000NM models if possible!
Read error rates are meaningless on Seagate drives. It's tallying internal data and not indicative of drive health.
On a SAS disk, grown defects are reassigned blocks, not read and seek error rates.
Sorry, I just read "disk read errors" from previous poster and see a lot of people freak out over the seek error rate or disk read error attributes.