Technology

37705 readers

99 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

alyaza@beehaw.org

TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org

gyrfalcon@beehaw.org

rs5th@beehaw.org

SemioticStandard@beehaw.org

TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social

Los@beehaw.org

coldredlight@beehaw.org

remington@beehaw.org

112

AI is modeling David Attenborough and the filmmaker isn’t happy (www.androidpolice.com)

submitted 11 months ago by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to c/technology@beehaw.org

41 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 9 points 11 months ago (2 children)

If it's something for profit by some massive multi billion dollar company, definitely. That's just pure greed. But some tiny indie game dev or YouTuber using ai voiceovers is quite a bit more acceptable imo.

[–] sculd@beehaw.org 2 points 11 months ago

Agreed. Butterbee's explanation in this thread is much better than my word.

[–] RandoCalrandian@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago

Is there a specific dollar amount where a creator isn’t allowed to create the way they want anymore?