this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2026
147 points (98.7% liked)

politics

30914 readers
2051 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 58 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (3 children)

Hakeem Jeffries and Chuck Schumer are the Dems' neverending rolling disaster. They need to be ousted.

And while they're at it, they should throw out those two other double-crossing motherfuckers too.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 5 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

a relatively small number of dems in the house and senate can call for a dem-party-only vote to elect a new leader in their chamber. But that vote never gets called for. That tells me that Schumer and Jeffries are part of a much larger problem within the party. If we get rid of Schumer and Jeffries the corpo-dems will just put forth another. They are already positioning Slotkin to take over for Schumer. She's a hardcore zionist who is on the pro business caucus and is proudly a blue dog. A good days work for her is signing her name on a bill thats also supported by republicans. Also known as being a traitor to her party.

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 hours ago

Let them try, the can't sideline the dsa this time

[–] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 3 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

"...proudly a blue dog"

So a Republican with a 'D' next to their name.

With the nature of media it's not hard to notice that 2-3 democratic-socialists get elected to office nation-wide and the establishment wants to act like all problems are solved, even though there are still several-hundred more corpo Democrats that need to be replaced across the country.

[–] Washedupcynic@lemmy.ca 25 points 15 hours ago

Why Are Wes Moore and Cory Booker in Peter Thiel’s Secret Society?

I assumed it was because they were also of the pedophile persuasion. But I guess it could be because they are happy to be technofascists for the right price.

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 7 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Unfortunately society is full of "politically slow" people who either don't pay attention, are subject to extra propanagda, or just slow to cotton on... And they sort of screw things up for everyone.

I mean, there are still Trump supporters out there.

[–] FrostyTheDoo@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

It's because a long time ago those in power realized they can literally create more of those politically slow people on purpose, by starving them of education and feeding them nonstop propaganda about never looking behind the curtain.

Now they have a dumb, submissive electorate that can't stop electing them even if they wanted to. We're trapped, and we'll have to gnaw our own leg off to get out.