this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2026
87 points (93.1% liked)

Linux

14806 readers
164 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Slop Linux got money to spend and the reactionary ----- is the first one to get it.

David Heinemeier Hansson, aka DHH, has put a number on how serious he is about desktop Linux. That number is eight million dollars, and it's going into a brand new nonprofit called the Omacom Foundation.

DHH is incorporating the foundation now, set to cover the Omarchy trademark, its infrastructure and hosting, promotion for the project, and funding for the open source developers whose work it depends on.

He calls it a "moral obligation," not just to get Omarchy into more people's hands but to change how they use a computer in the first place.

The above is so Google-in-early-days-vibes coded that one has to think they should know by now that nobody is buying it. Except that the gen alpha has the attention span of a flea and doesn't really read anything nor it's interested in History. So those techy bozos will always find new prey.

Michael Dell of Dell Technologies, Patrick Collison of Stripe, Tobi LΓΌtke of Shopify, Jack Dorsey of Block, Matthew Prince of Cloudflare, Jason Fried of 37signals, Brendan Iribe of Sesame, and DHH himself each put in a million dollars to make it happen.

People already like using Omarchy, DHH says, and he wants this money to last as long as possible instead of getting spent all at once while also making the most out of it.

There are two major updates to this. Omacom funding has hit $10 million, and it has become a premier sponsor for Quickshell.

Hyprland first to gain

Hyprland is the first project outside Omarchy to see any of this money. Omacom is extending an exclusive sponsorship to support Vaxry, the developer behind the Wayland compositor Omarchy runs on.

Under this, he is locked into an agreement for three years, with the possibility of extending for two more years.

This way Vaxry gets to work on Hyprland full time without needing to think about the money. As part of this arrangement, the €5/month Hyprperks subscription service will be discontinued, and everything offered under it will be provided for free.

DHH also joked about finding Vaxry a pookie, noting that:

Many thanks to 37signals (hello self! πŸ˜‚), Butterfly, and Framework for helping Hyprland get to this point. Thrilled that the Omacom Foundation can take over from October 10, and give one of the best developers in this new Linux moment the chance to go all-in.

(* This deal does not include any direct assistance in getting Vaxry a girlfriend, but I’ll personally be available as a reference for any inquiries on the matter.*)

I'll feel bad for any girl taking her chances.

Do you remember this?

This isn't the first time we are talking about money and Hyprland. Back in 2025, Framework became a Gold tier sponsor of the project. But that didn't sit too well with many people, as soon after, a thread titled "Framework supporting far-right racists?" came up on the official forum.

The original poster called out Vaxry's old freedesktop.org ban and pushed Framework to explain why it was funding the project. Framework's own account made things worse that same day. It posted a tweet comparing Omarchy to the old Windows XP product key meme, and people read that as an endorsement of DHH.

While Framework did send hardware to people at Omarchy, the project itself never got any direct funding. Later, Framework had to start publishing a running list of its sponsorships after people kept asking exactly who the company was funding and why.

Where Omarchy's headed

Quattro, Omarchy's newest release, shipped recently, building AI agents into the desktop by default instead of treating them as an extra. While none of the eight patrons have said publicly that Omarchy's AI bet factored into their decision to back the foundation.

My read is that it's hard to ignore, especially with Michael Dell's company betting heavily on AI infrastructure elsewhere. A distro built around AI agents is exactly the kind of bet a company selling AI hardware would want to back.

And it all ties into what DHH said about truly democratizing Linux.

Whether that $8 million and a nonprofit structure are what bring about the "year of the Linux desktop" is a question for another time

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Hominine@lemmy.world 53 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Ah, the reason I refuse to consider Framework. Rich tech bros love climbing in bed with the worst kind of people.

[–] massive_bereavement@fedia.io 37 points 2 days ago (4 children)

While Framework did send hardware to people at Omarchy, the project itself never got any direct funding. Later, Framework had to start publishing a running list of its sponsorships after people kept asking exactly who the company was funding and why.

πŸ‘€

[–] sbeak@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 day ago

Just of note, it's more Framework's response being "we are a big tent" being the main issue, as well as the promotion of Omarchy on their social media. I would like to emphasise that most other big tech companies are likely far worse in stuff like this and a lot less transparent too. If you do feel that you don't want to support Framework financially, I would highly recommend getting used laptops to reduce e-waste + get a cheaper nearly-new device, ideally not through a service owned by big corporations.

[–] SatyrSack@quokk.au 33 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Unfortunately, that "running list" is not like some official federal transparency report or anything like that. For all we know, that list is effectively just "The projects we are willing to admit we donate to".

https://frame.work/blog/framework-sponsorships

[–] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 11 points 2 days ago (2 children)

They just sponsored his events more than any other event (including in combination of all the major ones), as well as constant social media posts by comparison to anything else.

I put their response squarely in "marketing bullshit to avoid responsibility" territory.

I, too, will no longer look at framework.

[–] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I am bummed to learn that Framework sponsored DHH events like that.

It sucks because what Framework is trying to achieve is really cool.

[–] exdor@programming.dev 2 points 1 day ago

To be honest they also kinda suck for not promoting coreboot at all.

They gave some coreboot devs a few laptops, didnt like the result and gave up. Meanwhile people are still working on that in their free time, apparently it isnt even that complicated and kinda just works?

It sucks because what Framework is trying to achieve is really cool.

It unfortunately makes the goals appear as nothing more than marketing to me now. If they actually wanted to achieve those goals, in no way would their donations be so out of balance.

[–] SatyrSack@quokk.au 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They just sponsored his events more than any other event (including in combination of all the major ones)

Every other event is about general hardware stuff. The rest of the donations are to specific distros, desktop environments, or other software, where the donation will help fuel development of software that will directly benefit Framework devices running Linux. And then they donate to... a conference dedicated to an obsolete web application framework? That just sounds like "Oh, your customers got upset when they learned you donated to me? Just say you donate to this other thing that doesn't look like me, and the money will still get to me."

And then they donate to... a conference dedicated to an obsolete web application framework?

Its just so blatant. And more money than the open source summit got! TWELVE TIMES WHAT THEY GAVE TO KDE AKADEMY!

Its gross. Fuck framework.

[–] lemmyng@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Yeah, I thought the general vibe around Lamework was that they were transphobic technofascist pieces of shit.

[–] terabyterex@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

this is the first i am hearing of this. i am unable to find any source for this. maybe i suck at searching but can you source this information?

[–] VexLogic@feddit.online 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Genuinely curious where this sentiment is coming from. Got any links for me to learn what they've been up to?

[–] jobbies@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 days ago

In fairness, I also love climbing into bed with the worst kind of people.

[–] naught101@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago