this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2026
23 points (100.0% liked)
Programming.dev Meta
2776 readers
1 users here now
Welcome to the Programming.Dev meta community!
This is a community for discussing things about programming.dev itself. Things like announcements, site help posts, site questions, etc. are all welcome here.
Links
Credits
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
OK, if there is a monopolistic instance between you and the rest of the world that decides who can reach you and who not and you are depending on that single monopolistic instance, I think we all agree that this is a bad thing.
Potential threads from this are (but not limited to):
It's the site owners who are rolling out anti-abuse systems. They picked a vendor to meet their needs. I don't think Cloudflare put a gun to their heads to force them to onboard their services. Do you?
You mean "hypothetical", not "potential".
Meaning, they are imaginary scenarios, and they represent the worst case you could think of.
You need to ask site owners what is their policy for these hypothetical scenarios you invented. On a technical side, removing anti-abuse protection is all it takes to fix it. This means that no action is required to address any of your hypothetical concerns.
I really don't know what you are aiming for...
Concerns about cloudflare becoming an issue are totally valid. Good day.
If you need anyone to spell it out to you, you are mindlessly complaining about programming.dev adopting anti-abuse services from a service provider. When lightly pressed on the topic, you fail to present a single problem of doing that or even a single coherent argument against it.
In short, you failed to point out any problem involving or any reason to replace an anti-abuse system. And yet you argue the service should be replaced.
Is "why" such an insurmountable challenge?