this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2026
794 points (99.4% liked)

Work Reform

17362 readers
3120 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Aquila@sh.itjust.works 51 points 13 hours ago (4 children)

I would like to permenantly house and feed myself for $16k. I have cash. Tell me how

[–] Kanda@reddthat.com 2 points 1 hour ago

Move to one of the poorest countries in the world, live in a hut and do nothing except eating. Don't get bit by wildlife or bugs.

[–] thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works 27 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

It’s likely a room in a boarding house, and food through a volunteer kitchen - so that $16K is still being subsidised through private charities and/or local + state Government grants.

Don’t mistake me, though - I’m all for these types of programs. They’re a hell of a lot better than a swathe of people being homeless on the streets, or incarcerated in an overcrowded prison.

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 1 points 37 minutes ago

if you take the capitalism out of the housing, and didn't have a dipshit fucking the global economy and cost to eat. in all but the expensive cities in the u.s., it's probably not that far off for communities of small flats or tiny homes and community-run kitchens.

[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 3 points 4 hours ago

But yeah even if it cost double to house them rather than imprison them it would still be the right and rational thing to do

[–] tyler@programming.dev 5 points 11 hours ago

I’m pretty sure the actual cost is to permanently house and feed them until they can get a job that gets them self sufficient.

[–] 13igTyme@piefed.social 3 points 11 hours ago

Yeah, those numbers don't make sense with the word "permanently".