Machine Learning

1 readers

1 users here now

Community Rules:

Be nice. No offensive behavior, insults or attacks: we encourage a diverse community in which members feel safe and have a voice.
Make your post clear and comprehensive: posts that lack insight or effort will be removed. (ex: questions which are easily googled)
Beginner or career related questions go elsewhere. This community is focused in discussion of research and new projects that advance the state-of-the-art.
Limit self-promotion. Comments and posts should be first and foremost about topics of interest to ML observers and practitioners. Limited self-promotion is tolerated, but the sub is not here as merely a source for free advertisement. Such posts will be removed at the discretion of the mods.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

communick@academy.garden

[D] Why don't we have robot assistants yet? (alien.top)

submitted 11 months ago by harrisonfield@alien.top to c/machinelearning@academy.garden

15 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I've spent the past few months diving into recent publications from conferences like CoRL, ICRA, IROS, RAUL, CVPR, and some preprints of note. It seems like we're getting pretty close to robotic assistants that can perform a limited range of tasks and be deployed in people's homes. Where do we think we are with this tech? What do you think is the biggest bottleneck we need to overcome? Do you think the "internet scale" behavioural cloning techniques from Google will lead the way? Or something more RL-VL oriented?

I'm at the start of an AI PhD with a focus on robotics so I'd love to hear people's thoughts on this!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Wyvern_king@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I was just at CoRL a couple weeks ago so I'll just briefly summarize some of the discussions I was part of/ listened to.

As other have mentioned, homes are a complex and unstructured environment where new situations are constantly being introduced to a system. Places like factories and warehouses where robots are starting to become common are generally more controlled and configurable to allow robots to operate.

Building on this is the issue of reliability. Cutting edge research will achieve SOTA results on tasks with something like a 90% success rate. For many tasks that humans do around the home, a 90% success rate is pretty terrible. I think it was Russ Tedrake at the conference that said something along the lines of "if someone broke 10% of the dishes while loading the dishwasher, we'd immediately take them off dish duty".

The field is making tons of progress on both of these fronts but it's just not at the point where systems are ready to be widely deployed in homes.

[–] harrisonfield@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

That is a really good point, thanks!