Machine Learning

1 readers

1 users here now

Community Rules:

Be nice. No offensive behavior, insults or attacks: we encourage a diverse community in which members feel safe and have a voice.
Make your post clear and comprehensive: posts that lack insight or effort will be removed. (ex: questions which are easily googled)
Beginner or career related questions go elsewhere. This community is focused in discussion of research and new projects that advance the state-of-the-art.
Limit self-promotion. Comments and posts should be first and foremost about topics of interest to ML observers and practitioners. Limited self-promotion is tolerated, but the sub is not here as merely a source for free advertisement. Such posts will be removed at the discretion of the mods.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

communick@academy.garden

[D] Why don't we have robot assistants yet? (alien.top)

submitted 11 months ago by harrisonfield@alien.top to c/machinelearning@academy.garden

15 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I've spent the past few months diving into recent publications from conferences like CoRL, ICRA, IROS, RAUL, CVPR, and some preprints of note. It seems like we're getting pretty close to robotic assistants that can perform a limited range of tasks and be deployed in people's homes. Where do we think we are with this tech? What do you think is the biggest bottleneck we need to overcome? Do you think the "internet scale" behavioural cloning techniques from Google will lead the way? Or something more RL-VL oriented?

I'm at the start of an AI PhD with a focus on robotics so I'd love to hear people's thoughts on this!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] bgighjigftuik@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Because we don't have models capable of performing actual reasoning

[–] skydivingdutch@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

The foundation models are getting there....