this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2026
330 points (99.7% liked)

Technology

87733 readers
4430 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

You could include energy usage in the equation, but if you're buying a $10,000 Mac Studio to edit your PDFs and watch YouTube, then that's your own decision. That's also not what we're talking about here.

The Mac is still going to be incredibly energy efficient.

Let's break it down for Qwen 3.5 MoE.

  • M4 Ultra Mac Studio:
    • 22t/s
    • ~ 210Wh
    • 9.55 watts per token/s
  • B300 GPU:
    • ~ 2160t/s per GPU
    • ~ 1750Wh (14Kwh 8 GPU System)
    • 0.88 watts per tokens/s

The Mac Studio comes out using ~ 11-12x more energy per token. Making it extremely energy inefficient at this task in comparison.

[–] xSikes@feddit.online 1 points 1 day ago

Not saying it wasn’t implied but didn’t offer it in my original comment but yeah, that’s what I’m talking about. It’s a computer, PC, desktop, workstation…… mostly like someone would be doing other things instead of just AI. You might be talking about just AI on the Mac Studio. To be fair, neither of us clarified our standings, till I ask further questions based on on my original comment. So you’re not wrong, just not what I was getting at. Thanks for sharing though.