this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2026
382 points (99.5% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

17712 readers
236 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--If a picture is just a screenshot of an article, link the article

--If a video's content isn't clear from title, write a short summary so people know what it's about.

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bitteroldcoot@piefed.social 95 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Because in trump’s America, only the rich get to eat safe food.

Soft eugenics and trump, look it up.

[–] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 40 points 5 days ago (2 children)

It's worth noting that this was a rising problem during the Biden administration too, from the article:

The USDA’s Food Safety and Inspection Service inspects poultry plants monthly. The new report shows that five U.S. poultry plants exceeded maximum allowable salmonella contamination every month from 2020 to 2024. These included a Carthage, Mo., turkey plant owned by Butterball, a Dayton, Va., turkey plant owned by Cargill Meat Solutions, and a chicken plant located in Cunning, Ga., that is owned by Koch Foods. A Costco chicken producer, Lincoln Premium Poultry, exceeded the standard in 54 of 59 inspections.

[–] bitteroldcoot@piefed.social 29 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Not surprised. Everyone bad mouths "the limits of grown". But every time I read stuff like this it is what comes to mind. You can only push things so far then they break in unique and unusual ways. You can't destroy the ecosystem and climate and use industrial farming then expect nothing bad to happen.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Limits_to_Growth#Criticism_and_responses

[–] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Though the issue is a bit more specific than just industrial farming in this case. Meat, dairy, etc. production is inherently really inefficient compared to eating plants because you have to do so much more farming for animal feed where most of the energy is lost

we show that plant-based replacements for each of the major animal categories in the United States (beef, pork, dairy, poultry, and eggs) can produce twofold to 20-fold more nutritionally similar food per unit cropland. Replacing all animal-based items with plant-based replacement diets can add enough food to feed 350 million additional people, more than the expected benefits of eliminating all supply chain food loss.

https://www.pnas.org/doi/abs/10.1073/pnas.1713820115

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 7 points 5 days ago (2 children)

can add enough food to feed 350 million additional people

Good thing birth rates are declining and we’ll all be dead from climate change related disasters and shortages before we need to worry about supporting another 350 million people.

[–] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 12 points 5 days ago

For what it's worth, moving towards a plant-based diet also helps with climate change too

Transitioning to plant-based diets (PBDs) has the potential to reduce diet-related land use by 76%, diet-related greenhouse gas emissions by 49%, eutrophication by 49%, and green and blue water use by 21% and 14%, respectively, whilst garnering substantial health co-benefits

https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/14/8/1614/html

[–] jve@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

Good thing

Whew!

[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago (2 children)

The potus has the power to remove regulation across the board but very little to actually enforce them. If new rules mean 1 in 4 chicken nuggets has salmonella, that's on Trump. But if Republican states want to stonewall & ignore food safety inspections, that's not on Biden.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 4 points 5 days ago

What do you mean? The presidency has enormous power at this point, and when it comes to enforcing regulation the power is actually granted by Congress

All the president has to do is convince these few companies that they're actually in danger of operations being shut down, even temporarily. They will respond a lawsuit to block this if they think that would be the easier path, but there's any number of ways to bring them in line. They'd lose an enormous amount of money for every day they're shut down... If they believe cleaning up their operations is going to be the cheaper path, they'll make changes unbelievably fast

The presidency also has enormous soft power... If the president calls a company out publicly for food safety, the share price will drop, grocers will switch suppliers if they can, and it'll affect sales

It all hinges on reputation though... It might take following through on a threat to bring the rest in line, but once they see food safety as the cost of doing business with no cheaper option, they'll absolutely fall in line

[–] HarneyToker@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

I would argue that we didn’t elect the president to just set regulations, we elect the president to solve problems. Creating a regulation and not enforcing it properly doesn’t solve any problems.

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 4 points 4 days ago

I mean, we could have guessed. How else would it make sense? But there is also Heritage foundations ideal population of 100 million, the elite clearly hating the poor, and making sure the poor get nothing good in life from them. They are libertarian too.

[–] SparroHawc@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 days ago
  1. Cook chicken

  2. Eat chicken

  3. No food poisoning

Just don't eat your chicken raw.