this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2026
73 points (87.6% liked)

politics

31081 readers
2725 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Numerous Democratic midterm candidates have previously made anti-trans statements or voted for anti-trans legislation. Trans journalist Erin Reed published a list yesterday of these candidates and advised her followers not to vote for them, lest their victories convince the Democratic Party “that throwing transgender people under the bus is a winning strategy,” Reed wrote.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Snowies@lemmy.zip 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Trans woman here. Them wanting more research on trans people in sports doesn’t scare me.

The fascist pedophile rapist war criminals scare me.

That is all.

[–] TRAHR@quokk.au 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Them pandering to right wing anti-trans propaganda scares me. We already have so many issues with liberals being fake performative allies willing to turn on a dime.

Concede this ground and the battlefield of public discourse will be pushed further.

[–] Snowies@lemmy.zip -4 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

What if we’re wrong?

What if height, wing-span, and upper body leverage advantages can occur from male puberty and don’t simply “go away” with hormone treatment?

The truth matters.

[–] TRAHR@quokk.au 5 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

You do understand that people come in a variety of sizes? Looking at female athletes their bodies dominate my little frame.

The fact you’re being such a fucking pick-me on this issue makes me livid.

[–] Snowies@lemmy.zip -5 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 16 minutes ago) (1 children)

It honestly seems like you’re just being a pick-me for the left.

There’s a reason medical transitions are a thing. Are you really going to sit here and say puberty and physical sex changes nothing?

Are you trying to change your body, or change the minds of the entire world?

What exactly do you expect?

[–] Snowies@lemmy.zip 1 points 31 minutes ago* (last edited 31 minutes ago)

I notice everyone has downvotes for me but no one has a real argument against what I’m saying.