this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2026
563 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

87972 readers
3040 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
563
Flock Camera Tells Cop New Car Didn’t Have Insurance When It Did, Cop Writes Ticket Anyway (deltiasgaming.com)
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works to c/technology@lemmy.world
83 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Georgia college student reportedly received a ticket from a cop after a Flock camera flagged her newly purchased vehicle as having no insurance when it did. According to a WSB-TV report, posted by podcast host Kacee Allen, the car has a temporary license plate, but the student presented a valid insurance card. Despite this, the officer reportedly still issued a citation. The incident reportedly happened twice, and the student now has to defend herself in court

According to the news report, the database that Flock cameras rely on was yet to be updated. This caused the system to falsely flag the newly purchased vehicle.

Renee Jones, the student’s mother, said her daughter was doing everything required of her. This included maintaining insurance and carrying proof of coverage.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] unitedwithme@lemmy.today -2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

OK, I'm not saying they're (police) are doing anything right or wrong. The initial comment I replied to was about not understanding why a ticket was still issued after proof given. I explained my experiences from what I've witnessed, but also not claiming (or trying to) this is what happened in this exact situation.

The last sentence I requoted of mine was a simple speculation or presumption out of the officer's own laziness to not verify.

The other issue, cops (IMO) don't care if they're wrong or right in these scenarios, bc the person they ticketed goes to court and provides copies of insurance and doesn't have to pay anything in the end; ("no harm no foul"). The biggest inconvenience is taking time off work to go to court in the first place. If the cop was right, well, be more added to their quota of tickets I guess. Plus it looks like they're actually doing something productive.

Calm the fuck down though bro, you're getting super bent out of shape reading WAY too far into something that you're wanting to be there about someone defending a cop or something and trying to call me out. OK cool? Get worked up over a comment online. I got better shit to do. You're just trying to comment for the sake of winning a pretend argument or upvotes... Go get 'em tiger

[–] PolarKraken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Arguments about cops are some of the very least pretend arguments there are today, so here you go again just revealing what's important to you and not. I'll let ya get back to it.

I did leave an unfortunate mistake in my last comment that shifted the tone from my intended somewhat neutral into pure snark, so I can't really blame you for getting mad just now, but anyway, regardless we don't have anything to discuss lol.