Machine Learning

1 readers

1 users here now

Community Rules:

Be nice. No offensive behavior, insults or attacks: we encourage a diverse community in which members feel safe and have a voice.
Make your post clear and comprehensive: posts that lack insight or effort will be removed. (ex: questions which are easily googled)
Beginner or career related questions go elsewhere. This community is focused in discussion of research and new projects that advance the state-of-the-art.
Limit self-promotion. Comments and posts should be first and foremost about topics of interest to ML observers and practitioners. Limited self-promotion is tolerated, but the sub is not here as merely a source for free advertisement. Such posts will be removed at the discretion of the mods.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

communick@academy.garden

[R] How to evaluate generative models? (alien.top)

submitted 11 months ago by Consistent-Thing-966@alien.top to c/machinelearning@academy.garden

10 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Hi all.

I was researching generative model evaluation and found this post interesting: https://deepsense.ai/evaluation-derangement-syndrome-in-gpu-poor-genai

A lot of it kind of corresponds to what I see happening in the industry and feels like a good fit here

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] martianunlimited@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

The typical measure for most ML conferences is the Fréchet inception distance (FID) but I have seen a number of generative AI papers, and what those values actually mean practically can be extremely obtuse, I appreciate papers that reports both the FID as a metric and also produce some representative examples of the output. (in the suplementary material if space is an issue)