I haven't "run away" anywhere, as you can see. And although I don't believe you, I still maintain that if your first thought about Carney selling this country for parts is that Harper being there will annoy Poilievre, then you might want to re-evaluate your priorities. But go on, shoot the messenger a few more times

[–] ragepaw@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Right back to the exact same talking point you’ve spammed four times now. Your record is skipping.

"I don't believe you" is classic. Of course you don't, because if I’m not a foaming at the mouth Carney worshipper, your entire meltdown makes zero sense. You have to invent a villain so you can play the brave, persecuted "messenger" instead of just a guy who humiliated himself in his own comment section.

[–] patatas@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's not my talking point, it's yours. You brought up Poilievre. I'm trying to figure out why it is that you are so upset by me calling this out. Why are you so mad about this?

[–] ragepaw@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I’m not upset. I’m just thoroughly unimpressed.

You demanded to know why people were laughing at Poilievre, got your answer, threw a tantrum because it didn't match your script, and now you're playing amateur therapist in the replies. If pretending I'm furious helps you cope with how badly you bungled this entire thread, hold onto that blanket tight.

[–] patatas@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 week ago

yes, you're so unbothered that you keep coming back for more of my "unhinged" behaviour