Machine Learning

1 readers

1 users here now

Community Rules:

Be nice. No offensive behavior, insults or attacks: we encourage a diverse community in which members feel safe and have a voice.
Make your post clear and comprehensive: posts that lack insight or effort will be removed. (ex: questions which are easily googled)
Beginner or career related questions go elsewhere. This community is focused in discussion of research and new projects that advance the state-of-the-art.
Limit self-promotion. Comments and posts should be first and foremost about topics of interest to ML observers and practitioners. Limited self-promotion is tolerated, but the sub is not here as merely a source for free advertisement. Such posts will be removed at the discretion of the mods.

founded 10 months ago

MODERATORS

communick@academy.garden

[D] Why don't we have robot assistants yet? (alien.top)

submitted 10 months ago by harrisonfield@alien.top to c/machinelearning@academy.garden

15 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I've spent the past few months diving into recent publications from conferences like CoRL, ICRA, IROS, RAUL, CVPR, and some preprints of note. It seems like we're getting pretty close to robotic assistants that can perform a limited range of tasks and be deployed in people's homes. Where do we think we are with this tech? What do you think is the biggest bottleneck we need to overcome? Do you think the "internet scale" behavioural cloning techniques from Google will lead the way? Or something more RL-VL oriented?

I'm at the start of an AI PhD with a focus on robotics so I'd love to hear people's thoughts on this!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] perta1234@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

Maybe, though we would have no problem if a dog was able to do that? Anyway, it could be a set of specialized skills without general skills There could be appearance of intelligence without actual general intelligence