Machine Learning

1 readers

1 users here now

Community Rules:

Be nice. No offensive behavior, insults or attacks: we encourage a diverse community in which members feel safe and have a voice.
Make your post clear and comprehensive: posts that lack insight or effort will be removed. (ex: questions which are easily googled)
Beginner or career related questions go elsewhere. This community is focused in discussion of research and new projects that advance the state-of-the-art.
Limit self-promotion. Comments and posts should be first and foremost about topics of interest to ML observers and practitioners. Limited self-promotion is tolerated, but the sub is not here as merely a source for free advertisement. Such posts will be removed at the discretion of the mods.

founded 11 months ago

MODERATORS

communick@academy.garden

[D] OpenAl vs. Llamalndex: Evaluating RAG Performance (alien.top)

submitted 10 months ago by tombenom@alien.top to c/machinelearning@academy.garden

3 comments fedilink hide all child comments

A comparison of the OpenAl Assistant API vs Llamalndex, where Llamalndex perfromed materially better than OpenAl.

Here's the TLDR; OpenAl's Assistants API: Showcases high efficiency with single documents but faces challenges when managing multiple documents. Llamalndex: Exhibits consistent performance across both single and multiple document formats, outshining OpenAl in more complex scenarios.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] coumineol@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

Indubitably.