NBA - Main

12 readers

1 users here now

Game analysis, highlights and everything else that is happening in the NBA.

founded 11 months ago

MODERATORS

communick@nba.space

[Serious] Where would Lebron rank in the Top 10 if he only won 1 ring in his entire career? (alien.top)

submitted 10 months ago by GilbertArenas0000@alien.top to c/nba@nba.space

31 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Recap of his achievements

James is the all-time leading scorer in NBA history and ranks fourth in career assists. He has won four NBA championships (two with the Miami Heat, one each with the Lakers and Cleveland Cavaliers), and has competed in 10 NBA Finals, including eight consecutive Finals appearances from 2011 to 2018.[1] He has also won four Most Valuable Player (MVP) Awards, four Finals MVP Awards, and two Olympic gold medals, and has been named an All-Star 19 times, selected to the All-NBA Team 19 times (including 13 First Team selections)[2][3] and the All-Defensive Team six times, and was a runner-up for the NBA Defensive Player of the Year Award twice in his career.[4][5] As of October 2023, he is the oldest player in the NBA.[6]

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] youaremehmeh@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago (12 children)

Hakeem is a worse player on the court overall but would have one more title but significantly less achievements elsewhere and it around 9-11. Lebron should be firmly in 5-8

[–] GilbertArenas0000@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago (11 children)

Lebron be placed firmly at 5 with 1 ring and 1 MVP makes no sense.

Kobe has 5 rings, 4x All Star MVP, 2x FMVP, 18x All Star, 11x All Star 1st Team, 12x All Defensive, 9x All Defensive 1st Team (most in NBA history), 2x scoring champion, 4th most points in history, 2nd most assists as a guard, and this sub for whatever reason thinks that resume isn't enough to be higher than 7 or 8, even though his resume is stronger than half the players in the top 10.

[–] GeoffSproke@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

It seems short-sighted to diminish a guy's legacy because the people around him weren't as good as the people on other teams. I think rings are probably the least precise way to measure how good someone is at basketball.

[–] markmyredd@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Nah what separates the top tier all time greats to the next group is rings because their accolades are pretty much close to each other.

[–] LackingOriginality07@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

When you put it like that seems like what separates the top tier all time greats and the next group is almost solely based off of who had better teammates

load more comments (8 replies)