this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)
NBA - Main
14 readers
5 users here now
Game analysis, highlights and everything else that is happening in the NBA.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Hakeem is a worse player on the court overall but would have one more title but significantly less achievements elsewhere and it around 9-11. Lebron should be firmly in 5-8
Lebron be placed firmly at 5 with 1 ring and 1 MVP makes no sense.
Kobe has 5 rings, 4x All Star MVP, 2x FMVP, 18x All Star, 11x All Star 1st Team, 12x All Defensive, 9x All Defensive 1st Team (most in NBA history), 2x scoring champion, 4th most points in history, 2nd most assists as a guard, and this sub for whatever reason thinks that resume isn't enough to be higher than 7 or 8, even though his resume is stronger than half the players in the top 10.
I like how you ask where he would rank, someone says what they think, and then you proceed to tell them that they're wrong
The reason is that LeBron is a much better basketball player than Kobe. But looking at your posts in this thread it seems like all you can do is run down memorized lists of awards, so of course it makes no sense to you.
To answer your question, though, teams win championships, not players. If LeBron played the same in all of those finals as in reality and his team just lost, his ranking wouldn’t change at all.
Because Kobe for all his resume has clear flaws as a player.
Lebron probably would still be top 5-10 based on his longevity.
Also depends on which ring, if it’s his 2016 then it’s probably the greatest ring ever. Even more than Dirk’s.
Magic literally played no defense and has 0x any All Defense Team nominations but he's consistently ranked top 5.
It seems short-sighted to diminish a guy's legacy because the people around him weren't as good as the people on other teams. I think rings are probably the least precise way to measure how good someone is at basketball.
Nah what separates the top tier all time greats to the next group is rings because their accolades are pretty much close to each other.
When you put it like that seems like what separates the top tier all time greats and the next group is almost solely based off of who had better teammates
Kobe isn't better than the guys above him. People watched these guys play. Kobe is not on that level.
you have to be an idiot to say Kobe is not on that level. Kobe was literally getting double and triple teamed for over a decade. He has beaten the most 50-win teams in the playoffs in NBA history. He was the greatest player of the 2000s.
Is this ranking the actual best players on the court or top 10 most accomplished players ever?
Kobe would be more accomplished but not the actual better player.
team player Lebron wins
Kobe has the deepest bag I've seen, more than Michael, and I think the 2 greatest 1v1 players of all time are Kobe and MJ.
Lebron is the better player if 5v5, Kobe is the better player 1v1. I think everyone agrees with that.