this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)
Machine Learning
1 readers
1 users here now
Community Rules:
- Be nice. No offensive behavior, insults or attacks: we encourage a diverse community in which members feel safe and have a voice.
- Make your post clear and comprehensive: posts that lack insight or effort will be removed. (ex: questions which are easily googled)
- Beginner or career related questions go elsewhere. This community is focused in discussion of research and new projects that advance the state-of-the-art.
- Limit self-promotion. Comments and posts should be first and foremost about topics of interest to ML observers and practitioners. Limited self-promotion is tolerated, but the sub is not here as merely a source for free advertisement. Such posts will be removed at the discretion of the mods.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Can't the training set provide data to how the curve seems to be rising (the change in value y for every corresponding change in value x)? And this change is carried forward to all future values of x to go with the trend and obtain the predicted results?
Thinking out loud with me intuition here. Is there is any model that resembles the above logic?
That can be informative, but as I was saying, you have to limit the function space to those compatible with your hypothesis.
I repeat my question in a clearer way: do you know (or have a guess of) what the function would look like after x=60?
Since you mentioned the rate of change, have you ever plotted the numerical derivative of this function? Maybe it's shape has a recognizable shape that could help you in identifying the right class