this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2026
634 points (97.2% liked)
Technology
88652 readers
3930 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
You misread what I said. If a game creator is using an LLM that was trained with art obtained without consent, that is, the artists were not compensated for that use, why should I compensate that game creator? They don't value the works of others, so I won't value theirs either
No artist's work is being directly used. It's like arguing that artists owe Disney or Studio Ghibli money if they learned from watching their animations.
But the artist was supposed to pay in some form to watch these animations because they are not in the public domain
Agreed. That's why I believe that all business applications of AI should be taxed, and those funds redistributed to the populace. Everyone conceivably contributed, therefore everyone should benefit.
Right, instead ALL artists work are being directly used to train the models. And no, it’s not like if another human person took inspiration from those artists.
Isn't it? That's one opinion, sure.