this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

NFL

76 readers
4 users here now

A place for NFL news, game highlights and everything that excites you about American Football.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] leehouse@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (4 children)

No guarantee that the Packers plan at receiver works out, and there have been plenty of rough stretches this year, but I'll take cheap, developing, and young over expensive, old, and bad.

[–] theskittz@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Agreed. With Lazard, The whole “yeah it’s 40 million but he’s a good blocker” copium from the preseason was astounding to me.

[–] Hog_and_a_Half@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Only the first two years are guaranteed.

It’s a short term deal that they can get out of, and it’s really not too far off what other WR3-tier players are getting in FA, which I think Lazard is.

Not a good deal, but not as bad as people are making it out to be.

[–] Sir_Carrington@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

Brother, Lazard was a healthy scratch. The guy didn't even make it to Christmas, it is as bad as people are making it out to be

load more comments (2 replies)