Entrepreneur

0 readers

1 users here now

Rules

No Personal Attacks - criticism of ideas is allowed, attacking people is not.
Self Posts Only - links can only provide supplementary material. Your post must contain enough content to have a discussion.
No “How To Get Rich Quick” posts - This community is not about making a quick buck. Posts asking the community how to make $X, without making specific reference to a reasonable idea, are not tolerated.
Avoid unprofessional communication - Please treat fellow entrepreneurs like respected coworkers, label conversations if NSFW and avoid deliberate provocations.

Please feel free to provide evidence-based best practices, share a micro-victory, discuss strategy and concepts with a frame work, ask for feedback, and create professional conversation. Treat every post as if you're at work and representing the best version of yourself.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

communick@indiehackers.space

Why all of these celebrities and wealthy people joining OnlyFans don't create their own platforms instead? (alien.top)

submitted 11 months ago by Redvolition@alien.top to c/entrepreneur@indiehackers.space

17 comments fedilink hide all child comments

So, first off, how much would it cost to build an OF-like platform? I know that basic cookie cutter video hosting websites go for 20 to 50k USD. Now triple that for extra gimmicks, lets say then 60k to 150k.

Unless I'm widely wrong about how much it costs to build a personal platform like this, why are all of these rich celebrities joining OnlyFans and accepting the 20% cut taken from them?

My hypothesis:

They for some reason actually want to be associated with OF as a marketing trick.
They want to be associated with OF due to a political agenda. What would that agenda be?
They expect to attract more subscribers from OF than on their own, due to people already having OF accounts to begin with, which streamlines subscription.
There is enough internal traffic on OF so that the platform itself can serve as an advertisement vehicle. OnlyFans has an estimated 1.25 million daily active users. I would imagine this is nothing to most of these celebrities, though, which already have comparable or higher followings elsewhere.
I'm wrong about costs.

Disclaimer: I don't use OnlyFans, and I'm only vaguely aware of how it works, so there is that.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Redvolition@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Frankly, I'm not convinced about the cost argument. There are thousands of small porn businesses hosting videos on their own websites and accepting payments via CCbill or alternative payment processors. I doubt they are all running expenses in the millions of dollars, since they wouldn't be profitable if that were the case.

[–] TourApprehensive2155@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

Running expenses aren't that bad, it's the development/maintenance cost that will set you back. Those places probably have in house tech/founders.