this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2023
709 points (96.5% liked)

Technology

59402 readers
4058 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 15 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

No. Humans have stopped nuclear catastrophes caused by computer misreadings before. So far, we have a way better decision-making track record.

Autonomous killings is an absolutely terrible, terrible idea.

The incident I'm thinking about is geese being misinterpreted by a computer as nuclear missiles and a human recognizing the error and turning off the system, but I can only find a couple sources for that, so I found another:

In 1983, a computer thought that the sunlight reflecting off of clouds was a nuclear missile strike and a human waited for corroborating evidence rather than reporting it to his superiors as he should have, which would have likely resulted in a "retaliatory" nuclear strike.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1983_Soviet_nuclear_false_alarm_incident

As faulty as humans are, it's a good a safeguard as we have to tragedies. Keep a human in the chain.