this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2026
1337 points (97.0% liked)

Work Reform

17806 readers
1138 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] stickyprimer@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago (3 children)

This would mean that the job would only appeal to two kinds of people: those earning below the average wage, or the very rich who don’t care what the job pays.

I’m all for low-earning folks getting a raise by running for Congress, but the problem is that anyone above average wage will see this as a pay cut. And the higher end of wage earners are the more highly educated, skilled, and experienced people.

Even if Congressional wages seem high now, most well qualified professionals can still earn way more in the private sector.

[–] __siru__@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 4 days ago

Sadly this is a very solid point. This would probably lead even stronger to the tendency that billionaires could simply bjy representatives/senators.

So deadass that's what I'm actually doing right now lol. Running for office cause it'd get me more money and time off, and well, I care about it anyways. Not congress tho, local type shit

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

dont you mean below average intelligence. they appeal to who ever makes up the most in a district, like rich people in schumers area.