this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2023
2 points (100.0% liked)

Data Hoarder

1 readers
1 users here now

We are digital librarians. Among us are represented the various reasons to keep data -- legal requirements, competitive requirements, uncertainty of permanence of cloud services, distaste for transmitting your data externally (e.g. government or corporate espionage), cultural and familial archivists, internet collapse preppers, and people who do it themselves so they're sure it's done right. Everyone has their reasons for curating the data they have decided to keep (either forever or For A Damn Long Time (tm) ). Along the way we have sought out like-minded individuals to exchange strategies, war stories, and cautionary tales of failures.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I am thinking of grabbing 2x 22TBs and putting them in Raid 1 using my motherboard SATA ports. The data isn't irreplaceable, so I simply want redundancy against a single failed drive.

However, I have two questions.

- Is the raid controller required to access data on Raid 1 drives? Let's say I take out a single drive, breaking the array, and put it in another system. Would my data still be accessible on that new system outside of the array? It's a simple mirror, so I assume so?

- If I swap my motherboard later, how big of a headache is the process to get raid 1 moved over?

Thanks.

โ€‹

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] eddiekoski@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

I am not saying what is best, but other options would be a software raid like (newer) Windows storage spaces and (older) dynamic disks, on Linux LVM, is similar; if it is only a two-disk array, you can even get a cheap or not cheap raid card, or even less dependent is have 1 be a continuous sync to the other. (This would have the most performance downside, but the pro is it will have the smallest stack of technology when accessing the data on new hardware.